Unless you want to use VLANs, I guess pretty much everything has been said here 
:-)

Simon



Am 14. Juni 2018 17:04:04 MESZ schrieb Kamil Khoury <kameel.alkho...@gmail.com>:
>Thank you both for your response.
>To be specific, all received messages have the same multicast address.
>the
>only difference between the two types of messages is contained in the
>message header that should be unpacked later at the protocol engine
>(over
>layer 2) not at the port. So the port should not have authority to
>decide
>the type of the message or to handle it. The job of the port is to
>receive
>the message and forward it up.
>In my case, the logical port should not even receive the message at all
>unless it belongs to its (virtual domain). To put it in simple words,
>I'm
>looking for two separate logical Ethernet connections on the same
>physical
>port that can be identified somehow by an ID. Just like how UDP
>identifies
>sessions by port numbers.
>
>Is this even realistic? because that's the only way I could understand
>this
>paragraph:
>"the node communicates with the network via two logical interfaces
>based on
>a single physical port"
>
>
>On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 4:32 PM, Sergio R. Caprile <scapr...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>> Regarding your image, it didn't get through my mail, "An HTML
>attachment
>> was scrubbed..." and I'm too lazy to go dig it. Anyway... it belongs
>> here now:
>> http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/lwip-users/2018-06/msg00050.html
>>
>> So you still want two hosts.
>> And as far as I can see, you need a bridge among them and the
>physical
>> port. How would a bridge respond to an incoming multicast frame on
>the
>> physical port? It will forward to both netifs, and the interested one
>> will answer... Does it help ?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lwip-users mailing list
>> lwip-users@nongnu.org
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
>>
_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
lwip-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

Reply via email to