> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lwig-terminology-01
I just fixed two editorial problems. It looks like we didn't find the time to discuss the more interesting substantive comments. E.g., I'd love to include some power terminology if we manage to converge quickly enough -- otherwise I'd like to ship this draft and do another one about power. I think there are more than two interesting Booleans here. One class system that has come up in offline discussions centered around sustained average power availability (which may also be bound by the ability to dissipate): a) ~ Tens of Watts (desktops > laptops) b) ~ Watts (tablets > phones) c) tens to hundreds of milliwatts (other rechargable devices, some building infrastructure, line-powered devices in standby mode) d) tens to hundreds of microwatts (living on an AA for a couple of years) Somewhat orthogonal to the sustained power availability, some of these devices may come with primary batteries. If there is some assumption that the lifetime of the device is bound to the lifetime of the battery, that somewhat changes the situation (every packet sent now cannot be sent later). Finally, the scavenging class includes both parking meters with big solar cells and light switches feed from the energy of the button press. Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ Lwip mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
