Hi Carsten,
As you may have inferred I am quite willing to provide text for the
power section.
Let's assume the convergence is quick.
peter
Carsten Bormann schreef op 2013-02-25 19:18:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lwig-terminology-01
I just fixed two editorial problems.
It looks like we didn't find the time to discuss the more interesting
substantive comments.
E.g., I'd love to include some power terminology if we manage to
converge quickly enough -- otherwise I'd like to ship this draft and
do another one about power.
I think there are more than two interesting Booleans here.
One class system that has come up in offline discussions centered
around sustained average power availability (which may also be bound
by the ability to dissipate):
a) ~ Tens of Watts (desktops > laptops)
b) ~ Watts (tablets > phones)
c) tens to hundreds of milliwatts (other rechargable devices, some
building infrastructure, line-powered devices in standby mode)
d) tens to hundreds of microwatts (living on an AA for a couple of
years)
Somewhat orthogonal to the sustained power availability, some of
these devices may come with primary batteries.
If there is some assumption that the lifetime of the device is bound
to the lifetime of the battery, that somewhat changes the situation
(every packet sent now cannot be sent later).
Finally, the scavenging class includes both parking meters with big
solar cells and light switches feed from the energy of the button
press.
Grüße, Carsten
_______________________________________________
Lwip mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
_______________________________________________
Lwip mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
