Hi Carsten, Personally I believe the power efficiency section is good enough for the terminology, and this is a good basis for future discussions.
To All, please review and express your opinions. Thanks in advance. Best regards, zhen > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Carsten Bormann > Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 12:48 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Lwip] lwig-terminology-02, now with power terminology > > As we discussed in Orlando, a small design team charged ahead and wrote down some power > terminology, creating a new section 4 in the terminology draft. Thanks Ari, Dominique, Peter. > And thanks Jari for letting us borrow some text out of lwig-cellular. > > Please have a look: > > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > > http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lwig-terminology-02 > > In Orlando, we said we wanted to time-box this into March, so: > > -- Is this the section that we wanted? > -- Does this need major surgery, or can we do a couple small fixes and then go for WGLC? > > Grüße, Carsten > > _______________________________________________ > Lwip mailing list > [email protected] > https://w _______________________________________________ Lwip mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
