On Apr 18, 2013, at 10:51, "Dijk, Esko" <[email protected]> wrote:
> secion 2.3.1; one sentence I found very cryptic. Perhaps to be rephrased: > It is not clear that "LLN" is much more specific than "interesting" or > "the network characteristics that RPL has been designed for". I have some pretty good editorial comments from Emmanuel Baccelli on this section. Hope I can send around an update proposal today... Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ Lwip mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
