On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 09:52:22 -0500 "Michael H. Warfield" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ok... > > So I work on a lot of RHEL / CentOS / Fedora / SL / NST stuff. > Basically they're all rpm based systems. I generally test through the > rpms. i.e. I don't build from scratch, scratch, I rebuild rpm's for > myself and install from yum each time. It actually makes things > easier and, occasionally, I spot something that I realize is wrong > that wouldn't show up otherwise... > > I've been puzzling about something and I think now that the > lxc.spec.in file needs some loving care and updating. What I noticed > was that a number of posts refer to "lxc-ls --fancy" but my version > of lxc-ls is a bash script and doesn't have that option. That's from > src/lxc/legacy. There's the python script lxc-ls but that's not > getting installed in the rpm by the spec file. Installing by hand, > the Python lxc-ls gives me "python: lxc module not found" or some > such. Hi Mike, I also almost always just build an rpm and install it. The python stuff doesn't get built on Oracle Linux 6.5 (so I suspect it will be the same for RHEL, CentOS, SL etc., but not Fedora) because there is no python3 available, which is why the legacy lxc-ls gets included there. I'd think configure would get the newer stuff built on Fedora, but maybe the .spec isn't packaging it? > Crap. That means the spec file has not been updated for all this API > stuff that's been going on and I'm not sure what needs to be updated > in there. I'd like to look at making those changes and bringing that > up to date ASAP before we go Beta (priority over a couple of other > putter projects) but I'd like some guidance over what's needed. I > fear it's more than just getting lxc-ls to the latest and greatest... I think it does make sense to update the .spec file and split out python into a separate pkg like the lua stuff is. > Regards, > Mike _______________________________________________ lxc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel
