On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 02:30:29PM -0500, Dwight Engen wrote: > On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 09:52:22 -0500 > "Michael H. Warfield" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Ok... > > > > So I work on a lot of RHEL / CentOS / Fedora / SL / NST stuff. > > Basically they're all rpm based systems. I generally test through the > > rpms. i.e. I don't build from scratch, scratch, I rebuild rpm's for > > myself and install from yum each time. It actually makes things > > easier and, occasionally, I spot something that I realize is wrong > > that wouldn't show up otherwise... > > > > I've been puzzling about something and I think now that the > > lxc.spec.in file needs some loving care and updating. What I noticed > > was that a number of posts refer to "lxc-ls --fancy" but my version > > of lxc-ls is a bash script and doesn't have that option. That's from > > src/lxc/legacy. There's the python script lxc-ls but that's not > > getting installed in the rpm by the spec file. Installing by hand, > > the Python lxc-ls gives me "python: lxc module not found" or some > > such. > > Hi Mike, I also almost always just build an rpm and install it. The python > stuff doesn't get built on Oracle Linux 6.5 (so I suspect it will be > the same for RHEL, CentOS, SL etc., but not Fedora) because there is no > python3 available, which is why the legacy lxc-ls gets included there. > I'd think configure would get the newer stuff built on Fedora, but maybe > the .spec isn't packaging it?
Up until this morning the python3 binding required an explicit --enable-python passed to configure. I only fixed that specific issue last night and have it now to auto-detection instead. > > Crap. That means the spec file has not been updated for all this API > > stuff that's been going on and I'm not sure what needs to be updated > > in there. I'd like to look at making those changes and bringing that > > up to date ASAP before we go Beta (priority over a couple of other > > putter projects) but I'd like some guidance over what's needed. I > > fear it's more than just getting lxc-ls to the latest and greatest... > > I think it does make sense to update the .spec file and split out > python into a separate pkg like the lua stuff is. > > > Regards, > > Mike > > _______________________________________________ > lxc-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel -- Stéphane Graber Ubuntu developer http://www.ubuntu.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ lxc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel
