-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 14.06.2014 15:58 Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> I assume you mean the LXC upstream, meaning the lxc.spec.in file we > have in under our source control as opposed to the one Fedora uses > in their project. So why not submit those changes for openSUSE to > us for incorporation, maintenance and comment? Actually, that's my plan, but therefore I wanted to check that the spec including my modifications does still build on other distributions. And Fedora was easyily available on the openSUSE Build Service... ;-) Regards, Johannes - -- Don't buy into bullshit. Don't admire false icons. We are just humans, not heroes. Think for yourself and stand up for what you believe is right. Don't be afraid to break stereotypes. Be true to yourself. Thank you. (The Used: In Love and Death) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SeaMonkey - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlOckHkACgkQzi3gQ/xETbIfQgCgnJvPZjlPa88XGQbusOp8pSt7 gCEAn2vmrRh2JPaIdIB0jPGSiRRlSjSL =8PMk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ lxc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel
