Quoting Mark Constable (ma...@renta.net): > On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 07:58:02 AM Tycho Andersen wrote: > > LVM support is Coming Soon, and making it fast and stable > > will likely be a primary focus. > > On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 01:57:34 PM Serge Hallyn wrote: > > What will become the recommended backing store is actualy > > not yet implemented, but will be soon - that is lvm with > > thinpools. > > Does this mean that btrfs is considered a second class option > with the primary focus and most of your future lxd backing > store effort being put into LVM?
It is, for a few reasons. I don't think the support will ever go away, but lvm is going to be the preferred backing store. > If so then what would be the reason to "abandon" btrfs as a > preferred backing store (if it ever was)? I think so. -serge _______________________________________________ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
