On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 03:54:06 PM Serge Hallyn wrote: > > Does this mean that btrfs is considered a second class option > > with the primary focus and most of your future lxd backing > > store effort being put into LVM? > > It is, for a few reasons.
Sorry to persist with this but would you mind elaborating briefly on some of those reasons or point me to further discussion please? I have invested heavily in btrfs so I am a little "shocked" at this news. If I want to stick to btrfs then would I be better off relying on legacy lxc? _______________________________________________ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users