Not sure why my this thread is being hijacked to ask very general questions :) please don't confuse those with me ;)
Tycho, Thanks for the response regarding criu, I figured this may be the case from inspecting the criu source, but wasn't sure how this could be configured and whether there were known limitations. Considering criu has some sort of caching of hard/soft links, could this potentially use a lot of RAM during the snapshot phase if this limit were to be heavily increased? I also wondered if you had any response to the mounting issue using ext3/ext4 I sent the other day? I'm finding it odd that I get random successful migrations, but then can't replicate it. I'm always just testing with simple fresh Ubuntu containers. The container that caused the criu error was an exception to this. Many thanks, Jamie ________________________________________ From: lxc-users <lxc-users-boun...@lists.linuxcontainers.org> on behalf of Tycho Andersen <tycho.ander...@canonical.com> Sent: 09 November 2015 16:00:01 To: LXC users mailing-list Subject: Re: [lxc-users] LXD Live Migration On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 10:37:42AM -0500, Saint Michael wrote: > I must assume that LXC is not ready for production yet. Am I wrong? Yes, LXC has been used in production by many large organizations for many years. Tycho _______________________________________________ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users _______________________________________________ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
