Thanks for the F grade. In telecommunications, there is a special kind of software apps called switches, which actually involve dozens of apps, scripts, etc. That kind of complexity is only packageable in a container. Other industries can get away with far simpler infrastructures. A switch is responsible for the whole business and handles literally millions of dollars in phone calls daily.
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 8:57 AM Scott Lopez <scot...@gmail.com> wrote: > Wow, what a disaster of a thread. > > Wouldn't it be easier to learn how to properly package and distribute your > application suite using a tool such as Ansible than to learn how to break > LXC, deal with the quirks and figure out how to shoehorn it into doing what > it wasn't designed to do? > > You get a B- for creativity and a F for implementation. I'd never allow > this disaster in a production environment. Too many unforeseen consequences > of the implementation, any issues that pop up are going to be a joy to > track down. Is it the container, is it LXC, is it something else? > > Just because you can do something, doesn't mean you should. > > _______________________________________________ > lxc-users mailing list > lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org > http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users >
_______________________________________________ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
