Thanks very much to all and sorry for the delay.
> The /etc/lxc/lxc-usernet file was designed to be flexible > enough to one day support other types. It's just noone has done it > because noone's needed it. That very much answers my question to the point.
While you mentioned plain lxc instead of lxd earlier, lxd might be more suitable for you needs. Does https://stgraber.org/2017/06/15/custom-user-mappings-in-lxd-containers/ fit the bill? Look for "isolated"
Reading the link provided, I do not really see any difference to lxc at all?
And in addition it does not seem to mention nonprivileged networking. _______________________________________________ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
