>>>> 20060726 00:26 -0500, Stef Caunter >>>> But lynx.isc.org is current and quite acceptable. There is plenty of evidence of active development and code maintenance in both the readable text and breakout subdirectory date stamps.
It's common for external links to degrade over time, but putting energy into maintaining clean code should be preferred over website maintenance, especially when the included and very detailed documentation is the best source of usage information. <<<<<<<< His experience is mine. If the web-pages are not kept up, then, going by your other points, the best is to abandon them, and expose the directory-structure to the reader, as in the case of sites made for ftp-use, with all seen files dedicated to or part of a given release. >>>>>>>> The mailing list archives are the next best place to look when searching for specific issues. <<<<<<<< As if the ordinary passer-by had any hope of finding them! _______________________________________________ Lynx-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
