On Jun 17, 2007 at 04:36:48, Thomas Dickey wrote: >> if (child_lynx == FALSE && no_mail == FALSE && local_host_only >> == FALSE) >> >> It seems logical as long as file-saving is disallowed, but if we choose >> to do away with implied restrictions for "-child", then the check for >> child_lynx==FALSE should be lifted. > > or perhaps make "-child" also set no_mail
OK, so if the restrictions are traditional, there is some sense in that. The attached patch sets both no_disk_save and no_mail explicitly for "-child" and cleans up the code so that child_lynx is only checked for in handle_prev_DOC().
2.8.6rel.5-child_relaxed.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ Lynx-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
