On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 09:10:43PM +0400, Andrew Belov wrote: > On Jun 17, 2007 at 04:36:48, Thomas Dickey wrote: > > >> if (child_lynx == FALSE && no_mail == FALSE && local_host_only > >> == FALSE) > >> > >> It seems logical as long as file-saving is disallowed, but if we choose > >> to do away with implied restrictions for "-child", then the check for > >> child_lynx==FALSE should be lifted. > > > > or perhaps make "-child" also set no_mail > > OK, so if the restrictions are traditional, there is some sense in that. > The attached patch sets both no_disk_save and no_mail explicitly for > "-child" and cleans up the code so that child_lynx is only checked for > in handle_prev_DOC().
thanks (will be working on lynx sooon) -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net _______________________________________________ Lynx-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
