On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 08:06:27PM -0700, David Combs wrote:
> Certainly no LUCKER (who by definition never replies
> to the list at all) has any business in any official
> "vote" -- since it can't possibly affect any such person
> HOW the system works (re replyto, etc).
This is exactly the same attitude lynx users are constantly fighting when
facing a site that is geared towards IE/Netscape.
"We don't need to follow standards. We're smatter than everyone else, and
really know what's good for them. So we'll do what we want, standards be
damned!"
mrc
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work constantly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and be right all the time, or not work at all
www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/ and be right at least twice a day. -- mrc
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: lynx-dev Re: Administrivia: List "reply" a... Larry W. Virden
- Re: lynx-dev Re: Administrivia: List "reply&qu... Eduardo Chappa L.
- Re: lynx-dev Re: Administrivia: List "reply&qu... Larry W. Virden
- Re: lynx-dev Re: Administrivia: List "reply&qu... Henry Nelson
- Re: lynx-dev Re: Administrivia: List "repl... David Combs
- Re: lynx-dev Re: Administrivia: List "... Mike Castle
- Re: lynx-dev Re: Administrivia: List &q... Doug Kaufman
- Re: lynx-dev Re: Administrivia: Li... Philip Webb
- Re: lynx-dev Re: Administrivia... Philip Webb
- Re: lynx-dev Re: Administrivia: Li... Mike Castle
- Re: lynx-dev Re: Administrivia... Chuck Martin
- Re: lynx-dev Re: Administrivia... Eduardo Chappa L.
- Re: lynx-dev Re: Administr... David Combs
- Re: lynx-dev Re: Administr... Eduardo Chappa L.
- Re: lynx-dev Re: Administr... David Combs
- Re: lynx-dev Re: Administrivia: List "... Klaus Weide
