In a recent note, David Woolley said: > Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 08:10:08 +0100 (BST) > > > explicitly setting Reply-to: <self> <lynx-dev>. The message failed > > There should be a , after <self>, although I don't believe that > Majordomo does any checking of the contents of the line. > Elm supplied one. -- gil -- StorageTek INFORMATION made POWERFUL ; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: lynx-dev Re: Administrivia: List &q... Mike Castle
- Re: lynx-dev Re: Administrivia: Li... Chuck Martin
- Re: lynx-dev Re: Administrivia: Li... Eduardo Chappa L.
- Re: lynx-dev Re: Administrivia... David Combs
- Re: lynx-dev Re: Administrivia... Eduardo Chappa L.
- Re: lynx-dev Re: Administrivia... David Combs
- Re: lynx-dev Re: Administrivia: List "repl... Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev Re: Administrivia: List "reply" a... Larry W. Virden
- Re: lynx-dev Re: Administrivia: List "reply" a... Larry W. Virden
- Re: lynx-dev Re: Administrivia: List "reply" a... pAb-032871
