On or about 11 May, 2000, pAb-032871
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> While I like the IDEA of two comma-separated addresses in the
> "Reply-To:" header, it would mean the origial author gets two
> copies of every reply. Could make for a lot of sorting trouble
> if you leave your keyboard alone a few days. . .
I'm staying out of the "Reply-To:" controversy, but some might
find useful and be unaware of procmail's ability to /dev/null
duplicate copies, when the message-ids are identical, via a cache
of recent ids. I use it because I'm on a couple related lists
that tend to get a lot of crossposts. Details are in man(5)
procmailex, I believe.
--
Michael Warner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
