> As for complaining, forget it. The folks out there are > happily cranking their Microsoft systems and saying that they > read somewhere that JAWS which runs only on Windows and costs up > to $1500 solves all the worlds problems so just give up and start > shoveling money. The game is over.
This is the standard position that marketing people will take; if there is some technology that allows the blind to access their site, they will consider they have met any legal obligations for accessibility. This will be a moving target, especially as JAWS uses IE for its scripting support. > What I actually think is that limited javascript support Limited support might cope with Domino, as their way of doing onclicks with links to the non-existent null fragment (href="#") may not change enough to make it difficult to extract the real link. However anything short of a full IE like object model (full frames support, etc.) is likely to break for the "creative" designers. That's a complete re-write, not limited support. ; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
