On Fri, Dec 11, 1998 at 10:13:59AM -0500, Cedric Puddy wrote: > There was a (massive) discussion (featuring > John Ousterhout "the tcl guy" and Richard Stallman > [who seems to be responsible for the GNU architecure!], > and lots of other very knowledgable people) about > Tcl VS. other scripting languages. Most heavily > featured as an alternative was scheme. > > The messages were all collected and arranged at: > > http://icemcfd.com/tcl/comparison.html Looks very interesting. The GNU people seem to have made up their mind(s). What was the objection against scheme here? -- --- Mate Wierdl | Dept. of Math. Sciences | University of Memphis
- Candiate scripting language bases Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: Candiate scripting language bases Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Candiate scripting language bas... José Abílio de Oliveira Matos
- Re: Candiate scripting language... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Candiate scripting lang... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Candiate scripting language bases Cedric Puddy
- Re: Candiate scripting language bas... Mate Wierdl
- Re: Candiate scripting language... Cedric Puddy
- Re: Candiate scripting lang... Mate Wierdl
- Re: Candiate scripting... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Candiate scrip... Richard E. Hawkins Esq.
- Re: Candiate s... Andre' Poenitz
- Re: Candiate scripting language bases Amir Karger
- Re: Candiate scripting language bases Alejandro Aguilar Sierra
- Re: Candiate scripting language bases Jacek M. Holeczek