On Fri, Dec 11, 1998 at 07:19:04PM -0500, Cedric Puddy wrote: > On Fri, 11 Dec 1998, Mate Wierdl wrote: > http://icemcfd.com/tcl/comparison.html > > > > Looks very interesting. The GNU people seem to have made up their mind(s). > > What was the objection against scheme here? > > > > --- > > Mate Wierdl | Dept. of Math. Sciences | University of Memphis > > One of the fundemental differences of opinion seemed to be this: Ah, I read the thread. My question was what was the objection to Scheme here on *this* list. -- --- Mate Wierdl | Dept. of Math. Sciences | University of Memphis
- Candiate scripting language bases Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: Candiate scripting language bases Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Candiate scripting language bas... José Abílio de Oliveira Matos
- Re: Candiate scripting language... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Candiate scripting lang... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Candiate scripting language bases Cedric Puddy
- Re: Candiate scripting language bas... Mate Wierdl
- Re: Candiate scripting language... Cedric Puddy
- Re: Candiate scripting lang... Mate Wierdl
- Re: Candiate scripting... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Candiate scrip... Richard E. Hawkins Esq.
- Re: Candiate s... Andre' Poenitz
- Re: Candiate scripting language bases Amir Karger
- Re: Candiate scripting language bases Alejandro Aguilar Sierra
- Re: Candiate scripting language bases Jacek M. Holeczek