On Thu, Jan 06, 2000 at 12:23:00PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > That is true, one of my most expected features is a better inset, and also
> > the possibility to have general insets.
>
> Ok, suppose it were practically possible to configure such a general inset
> from a file (which I believe is at least theoretically possible).
> Would this be the prefered approach or would you prefer the current
> hard-coded approach? (Assume no performance penalty for the time being)
>
Maybe as transient state, before we reach the scripting language step. Yes.
No related but... the major difficulty in importing docbook in lyx is the
absence of a library to write the lyx format. Only the idea of writing
lyx format without help scares. I have done this before with sgml2lyx,
but I have lost the courage since then... ;)
> looks do-able... Of course the callbacks have to be hard coded, but we
> could use the Dispatch() interface for that, can't we?
Is there any major obstacle to this?
> Andre'
>
> --
> André Pönitz ......................... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
José
