Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> Then our spellcheck abstraction is wrong.
|
| Yes :)
|
| Lars> The controller does not need to know if it is accessing the
| Lars> spellchecker through a process or through a lib.
|
| Indeed. And the idea is that enchant might do that for us. However,
| what I would like first is some research to be sure that enchant does
| everything we need in all platforms.
And what if something new pops up tommorrow? Or that I want to create
support for useing www.webster.com as my dictionary?
Will I then have to recreate the abstraction that was just deleted?
Who talks about deleting the abstraction? My patch surely doesn't do
that. I actually think it would be a good idea to keep aspell for a
while until Enchant has been proved to be in widespread use as JMarc
said. IOW, the Enchant support class will of course derive from SpellBase.
Abdel.
