José Matos wrote:
On Monday 11 September 2006 17:23, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
The code and logic in ControlSpellchecker are completely backward. Start
again!
Yep, my patch was a first step in this direction but Lars just think in
terms of (unused) features. My strategy was to do the API right for one
platform (aspell) and then switch to Enchant. We could even add ispell
afterward...
As much as Lars is a nice guy his oracle's powers are missing. :-)
It was not evident in all the different threads this intention that you have
stated in a clear way now, this is my interpretation, certainly, but it
illustrates this point. I have read all the messages and I remember best
those with topics related with my interests, and I did not remember such a
clear goal.
Well, I think I communicate a lot already. I have described a number of
times the flaws in the controller. If someone is opposing some argument
to a patch, he should at the minimum read the code in question. Opposing
a patch because it removes some pseudo-feature is wrong.
I can understand that you did not remember the clear goal if this is not
of interest to you. My point is that you should if it is of interest to you.
That being said, I am maybe very bad at communication... I'll try to
improve. "Talk less, talk clear!" will be my new philosophy ;-)
Abdel.
