Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Georg Baum wrote:
| > Am Sonntag, 10. September 2006 21:25 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
| >> Let's do this cleanup in the next round then.
| > That is not possible if you use my bformat version.
| > BTW qt3 does not compile with your patch.
|
| I did not even test it... nor do I can.
| Quite frankly, there is more than enough work for qt4 only. I
| understand that you are willing to do some of the gtk work and that's
| great. But we should just stop the qt3 nonsense... please!
To me it is close to zero effort to keep both qt3 and gtk compiling in
addition to qt4.
Ah but that's because you are not doing the same kind of work that I am
doing right now.
To me, qt3 is difficult to maintain because:
1) compiling qt3 with mingw is dog slow
2) I think it is stupid.
I cannot force myself to do something I think is stupid.
I don't want one man that is unwilling to work on qt3 decide what
happens with it. Get consensus, then let's ditch it. Not before.
That's not exactly only me... And you cannot force people working on
what they're not interested in. More than that, I don't wanna work on
something that is sure to go sooner or later, that's just a waste of time.
Right now there is _zero_ interest among GUI developers.
Abdel.
