Angus Leeming wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Man, it's easy to select only some mail and not others...
| I have taken into account all comments except for the spellchecker
| changes. I am tired and too lazy to do it... But I will put Ispell
| back if there is consensus about that.
No need for consensus. Just put it back. Even better: get some rest.
Fixup the patch to not remove it, and then commit.
For fuck's sake, Abdel. He's saying commit some entirely separate patch but
don't mix up two unrelated changes. The reason being that he cares about
Subversion history; one logical change, one commit.
OK, agreed. That one tiny exception is not going to end the world.
| So, you agree to remove ispell and pspell support?
Hmm... I thouht you were going to add enchant support?
Why do you have to remove ispell and pspell to do that?
Obviously we are not in agreement after all.
Where's the "NO!"?
The third sentence.
He's asked two questions. If you can't sell the bigger
picture why should he buy it from you?
My point is that I should not have to sell anything. I, and others,
thinks that's the way to go. If someone is not OK for that way he should
do some homework and prepare his argument. If not, I do the work so _I_
should decide not that someone.
I'm bored of this.
I obviously angered you. That was not my intention. I am trying to
explain my way of thinking. I must be alone thinking that way obviously.
Abdel.
