Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | > | | You've just described my very plan ;-). I just thought it was
| > | > obvious
| > | > | so I didn't care to write it so explicitly. The problem is just that
| > | > | Lars won't allow step 1.
| > | > Very right. If the bus thing happens after step 1, we are left with
| > | > no
| > | > spellchecker.
| > | | Man, we are not talking about the linux kernel. This is not
| > rocket
| > | science we are doing here. If I am hit by a bus, another competent
| > | developer will be able to continue the work. We have quite a few
| > | here...
| > | | So Angus, is this "NO!" clear enough for you? ;-)
| > I still do not understand why you have to do step 1 first, and why
| > this cannot wait until last.
|
| If you did your homework, you would have understood ;-)
|
| Fact 1: The SpellBase interface doesn't encapsulate well the fact that
| the engine is a library or a process.
#ifdef NEW_CODE
#endif
or:
create new files for the newstuff and conditional compile so that you
can get the new stuff and all others get the ols stuff.
|So
| for me, step 1 is a must. If it is not for you, then please do the
| work yourself.
I think you are just unwilling to see alternatives.
--
Lgb
