>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb: Jean-Marc, attached please find Michael> a simple patch that improves CT in LyX 1.4. Essentially, the Michael> patch consists of three parts: >> Michael, as I told you yesterday, I think we should skip this >> patch for 1.4.3. Michael> Did you? I remember you said you like the patch. Yes, I like the patch. But I think it is too late in release schedule. Maybe I did not write it. >> Also, after I looked at implementing getStatus for accept/reject >> change, I found out that these lfuns are not suited for public >> consumption (they assume that the current selection is exactly one >> change, whereas it should apply to the change at cursor or all >> changes in selection (which can be of different types. >> Michael> I think I tested it. I will re-check it this evening. I the selection comprises both selections and deletions, the user will assume that all these changes will get apply. I think the real result will be weird. >> This points out why I really really should not accept seemingly >> trivial patches that come out of nowhere a few days before release >> :) >> Michael> Shame on me :-( No, shame on me probably. JMarc
