>>>>> "Ozgur" == Ozgur Ugras BARAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What do you have in mind?
Ozgur> well... multiple indices.. :)
Like in ${x_i}_j$, for example? ;)
Ozgur> I plan to support splitidx, since it runs once on the file. So,
Ozgur> it is easier to handle. For example, I will not have to control
Ozgur> the number of indices, since the file write handle of Latex is
Ozgur> limited.
I assume you have seen this page:
http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=multind
What is wrong with multind.sty?
Ozgur> However, splitidx is not available in every distro (for example
Ozgur> my suse doesn't have it).
My teTeX2 does not either.
Ozgur> supporting both packages brings new difficulties in terms of
Ozgur> consistency, though...
Ozgur> Oh, I will also keep support for ordinary index package.
The FAQ also says that memoir has its own implmentation. It might be
worth looking at.
Ozgur> - I assume you have some idea on how to implement this feature,
Ozgur> in terms of user interface etc. If you share your vision about
Ozgur> multiple indices, then both of us will be happy with the
Ozgur> result.
No.
But Juergen has probably more to say on the subject.
Ozgur> - I have limited time. I mean in two months, I will probably
Ozgur> disappear for six months. therefore I need somebody to maintain
Ozgur> the code when I am away. I am sure that I will finish a working
Ozgur> and clean version before I leave, but I cannot guarantee things
Ozgur> will work in every frontend.
If it works and is correctly documented, that should not be a big
problem.
JMarc
