Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Quite a few bugs in the qt4 frontend though.
Abdelrazak> Man, that's an entirely new frontend. Dialogs bugs are
Abdelrazak> easy to solve. Dialog bugs have almost nothing to do with
Abdelrazak> my cleanups. You could even help here. I never said it was
Abdelrazak> perfect and I always called for help. I _don't_ plead
Abdelrazak> guilty for the pseudo situation that we face here.
It is unfortunately too late to have this point of view. As long as
there was a qt3 frontend as backup, it was OK to say that we should be
nice with qt4 because that it is so new. Now that it has pushed all of
its siblings out of the nest, each and every bug in the qt4 frontend
is a regression wrt LyX 1.4, nothing else.
If it was not ready, it was not wise to push it.
I _never_ advocate to remove qt3. I always said that it's fine if
somebody tries to maintain it. Nethertheless, Georg and *me* were the
prime qt3 and gtk developers!
And I repeat myself: dialog bugs are far far far easier to solve than
core bugs. So it's not like we are in such hurry with regard to qt4.
Abdel.
