Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote: > Qt3 can be resurrected if someone wants to, but all others on the list > were positive about this.
Resurrecting qt3 is ridicolous. qt3 was removed because "it was eating too many resources to keep it even if it is allowed to rot", and now you suggest that those who want to keep it can resurrect it? The only sensible option for keeping qt3 would have been to let it stay in trunk. Any other way to keep it is bullshit, because that would eat far more resources. > Stop whining. Or have some cheese with it: I don't think you should call that whining. Maybe you can not imagine how your activities look from outside, but I can. Georg
