On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 03:16:33AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > >>>SVN was _not_ broken. > > >First, you need not. svn help mv. URL->URL is the interesting part, > >just rename one of the 'offending' files, run 'svn up' and be done. > > TortoiseSVN suggested I should cleanup the tree but this doesn't help.
My hammer suggested I should drive a nail into that broken vase but this doesn't help. > >>My SVN makes lots of troubles and after a checkout try I got a totally > >>broken tree. > > > >[Just because TortoiseSVN bails out doesn't mean you have a broken SVN > >tree... Anyway...] > > If TortoiseSVN fails to checkout the tree is broken for me as result. If the hammer fails to fix the vase the world is broken. > >>On Windows I have of course only FAT and NTFS, in my case only NTFS. > > > >This 'of course' is a limitation imposed by yourself. There is no > >problem to have e.g. ext2 partitions under Windows... > > Come on, NTFS and FAT is used by all Win systems as standard so there's no > discussion that we have to take care of them. Come on, hammers is what I get when I buy 'Set Of Hammer 2003'. There's no discussion that a toolchest should contain anything else than hammers. > >>I hope you can understand that I'm not very happy as I have three > >>times this week to check out the sources completely to a new tree > >>because it was broken after SVN checkout trys. > > > >See above. I doubt your tree was actually broken. However, I understand > >you are not happy that it did not work out-of-the-box _twice_ this week. > > But you don't care about my problem, you just "broke" (tell it as you like) > it again with "Text.cpp". > I mean you know the problematic but still don't check if a renaming leads > to two files with the same name. Checking this could not be that difficult. At no time there where two files with the same name in svn. Andre'
