Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > José Matos wrote: >> On Tuesday 22 May 2007 8:52:30 am Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> Are we sure? The 1.5 branch would be better with the real 1.34, rather >>> than a prerelease. >> >> I tend to agree with Jean-Marc here. > > Me too. > > Abdel. >
I've updated to boost 1.34 in a branch, and it's not that hard, it compiles and runs without problems. The changes are: $ svn ci -m"check in changes of already exisiting files" Sending boost/boost/bind/storage.hpp Sending boost/boost/config/no_tr1/utility.hpp Sending boost/boost/filesystem/cerrno.hpp Sending boost/boost/iostreams/detail/streambuf/indirect_streambuf.hpp Sending boost/boost/mpl/aux_/lambda_spec.hpp Sending boost/boost/optional/optional.hpp Sending boost/boost/preprocessor/config/config.hpp Sending boost/boost/regex/v4/cpp_regex_traits.hpp Sending boost/boost/regex/v4/regex_traits.hpp Sending boost/boost/spirit/utility/loops.hpp Sending boost/boost/type_traits/is_convertible.hpp Sending boost/libs/filesystem/src/operations.cpp Sending boost/libs/filesystem/src/path.cpp Sending boost/libs/filesystem/src/portability.cpp and renaming none_t.hpp to boost/boost/none.hpp Should I update the header files? JMarc says in bugzilla that we should not update filesystem? Peter
