Neal Becker schrieb:
Oh, I did get an answer. Unfortunately, I can't seem to find the message right now, but the answer is, that I need to make that agr->pdf instead of agr->pdf2.

There was also a discussion that the use of pdf{,2,3} was really a broken design.

I wonder whether we should drop the dvipdfm path for 1.5.X. Is anybody actually using this (possibly outdated) tool? Offering tree ways to generate PDF may cause more confusion than it brings benefits.

Michael


Reply via email to