Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I take it you mean ++cur.top(). Would it help to call it > CursorSlice::forwardPos ?
Definitely. ++ does not tell whether you increase the index, the pit or the pos. > If fact it is rather weird, and the "proof" is that we don't need this > feature at all in the code. Without that "feature" (and no caller code uses > it currently), the thing only moves on a flat cursorslice, I find > counterintuitive to have it on DocIterator. Agreed. Go ahead with CursorSlice::forwardPos. JMarc
