On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 04:33:19PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > > >I just build release-static and release-dynamic with current svn 'pure > >autoconf'. debug-static is in the pipe. > > > >I'd like to hear of any problems people experience (and, of course any > >idea on with the --with-qmake build crahes when constructin a > >boost::signal) > > I might be able to set up a temporary system on a linux server that builds > with different options this weekend. That might make it easier to check > that it builds without warnings/errors? You'll have to tell me what > combinations of options I should test though.
a) --with-debug vs --without-debug b) <nothing> vs --disable-dynamic --enable-static c) in-tree vs out-of-tree Mac might be interesting, Jean-Marc mentioned installation into the wrong place there. > Do you know if there's still a difference with using a separate build > directory? (In other words, is there a point to testing with and without a > separate build directory). Good question. Just started my first in-tree-build. Andre'
