Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Could you be more precise? I do not think the behaviour of Return has > been changed recently. What would you like to see?
I'm referring to the old behaviour where M-return was necessary to preserve the nesting level. > > I'm not sure I like this. Why should we double the functionality of > > depth-decrement? > > Currently, pressing Return on an empty paragraph does nothing. The > idea is for example, at the end of an enumeration, one types return > twice and LyX is back to top level standard style. I see. But this could be implemented in a second step. Jürgen
