Dov Feldstern wrote:
John Levon wrote:
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 06:37:05AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
If what Martin means is that *LyX* will have no ambiguity, e.g, when
generating latex/XML, then I think that the disambiguation algorithm
suggested in this thread
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/95997 (plus the
refinement suggested by JMarc, which uses the extent of the ranges,
see the whole thread) would solve any ambiguities that might arise
with ranges; hence, this is not an advantage relative to ranges.
Doesn't exist yet, and doesn't sound simple.
It's also pretty self-contained. Sometimes we must take the hit of some
slightly more complicated code for a better UI experience.
Self-contained also means better maintainability, because there are less
chances of someone breaking the whole mechanism by playing with some
seemingly unrelated piece of code. I'd much rather have a self-contained
but complicated piece of code (if the interface is well defined and I
can trust that it works), than simpler code spread out all over the place.
You've just made a plea for charstyle as inset: fonts are spread all
over the place whereas insets are self contained.
:-P
Abdel.
