Bo Peng wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Pavel Sanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you guys feel that neither proposal should be
implemented for 1.6.0, I will not complain.
thats exactly my feeling now.

I have seen Jurgen and Abdel's emails so I guess I do not have to wait
for a week. Jurgen and Abdel was only partly right because my
implementation is more or less done and can be made ready for 1.6.0. I
also disagree with your judgment because all aspects of this feature
have been thoroughly discussed so time is unlikely to bring anything
new. What is actually needed is time and patience from some developers
like you, to read the wiki page, think carefully about this feature
and make a decision. If this can not happen now, it will not be done
in the future either.

Anyway, I guess I can safely assume that Richard's approach will not
be part of 1.6.0.
Sorry Bo but I have to say that you've been being unfair to Richard in general. He had the pugnacity (or should I say stoicity?) to continue the discussion regardless of your repeated critiscisms and I think you should respect that.

 This is quite a relief to me so I can assume my
dormancy with a peace of mind.
My personal reluctance to include one approach or the other is caused more by its social impact than its technical merit.

 I need to apologize to you guys
(especially to Uwe and Edwin) for setting time frames for discussion.
I was just afraid of prolonged discussions and did not mean to
bulldoze anyone.

Enough said, please remember to CC me if one of my features needs
maintenance, or time is ready for the embedding discussion again.
Which reminds me that there are some critical bugs related to 'listings' that needs fixing ;-)

Abdel.

Reply via email to