> I'm afraid I have to join this discussion again. I must say that I agree > with Abdel here, and Bo's reply just reinforces Abdel's point.
Bennett, I have pointed out quite a few times that I would agree with Richard's proposal as long as it can be implemented in a non-intrusive way. That is to say, it does not matter whether or not I agree with Richard's global bundling idea. Suppose that I totally agree with Richard's idea, someone needs to implement it, right? Richard did not want to do it so I have tried to figure out a few implementation details. I have found that his method is quite complicated to implement and is very intrusive to how users use lyx. Now, what do you expect me to do? Richard would deny any problem because he would not talk about implementation, and no one else is willing to go into such a detail and make a third-party judgment. That was where we got stuck. The situation is that Richard does not know how to implement his proposal, so he fails to realize how impractical his proposal is. I have been the bad man to point out a lot of problems with his proposal so I guess I did something terribly bad to him. I will for now declare that I totally agree with Richard's proposal but I do not know how to implement it correctly. Are you satisfied? Cheers, Bo
