On 25/09/2008 15:04, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
That's historical: pit_type == pos_type == int
> From what I remember, there was a reason for pos (we use -1 to get
labelfont, or something), but not for pit, is it?
AFAIR, the only reason that was given to me when I wanted to change
pit_type to size_t is that we are not sure of out of bound issues that
may appear in loops. I am quite confident nowadays that there will be no
such issue. So fine with me if you want to change it.
Abdel.
