On 25/09/2008 15:16, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:AFAIR, the only reason that was given to me when I wanted to change pit_type to size_t is that we are not sure of out of bound issues that may appear in loops. I am quite confident nowadays that there will be no such issue. So fine with me if you want to change it.Ahh, yes, it was about loops like while(pit>0) { ... ; --pit) that could just wrap around at 0, right?
Right. Abdel.
