Pavel Sanda wrote:
Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
Pavel Sanda <sa...@lyx.org> writes:
| Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Sure if a change is wanted we will go the full 10 yards... but why
unwilling to gain experience by testing with git-svn first?
Oh, I already use an like git. But I am affraid most developpers won't use
it if svn is still available.
| and there is a good question why should we migrate after all. while i enjoy
| git i see drawbacks from such switching too...
Please name them.
some random points currently floating in my head. i may add another ones later
on :)
1. commit numbers gone. its pita to work with hashes and for centralized trunk
development this is clearly loss of function.
Well, for bug tracking you can use tags, much better IMO than refering
to a svn revision number. And I guess it should be possible to have a
hook that creates the tag automatically if the commit contains a given
keyword (like #bug for ex).
As for refering to a svn revision instead of a git branch, this is a
different mental model indeed, but not not a loss of function IMHO.
Abdel.
