Re: stream_cast<> and Re: LyXFunc/LyXAction

[Lars Gullik Bj�nnes]

Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| > Am I right in saying that together they effectively give us the functionality 
| > of XTL? Or am I getting excited and being stupid at the same time?
| 
| No, that's basically what XTL would do - at least in this place.
| 
| And the idea to use strings in these places is not really new, either.
| IIRC the last proposal to use XTL was more or less a direct reaction to
| this idea, based on the (unvalidated and IMNSHO unjustified) assumption
| that using strings might be too slow.
| 
| Anyway. Nice to see you arriving there.

Also remember that most of the arguments to lyxfuncs are strings,
(actually to few of the lyxfuncs take arguments...)

        Lgb