On 13 Oct 2000, Lars Gullik Bj�nnes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Lars Gullik Bj�nnes wrote: > | > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | > | Am I right in saying that together they effectively give us the > | > | functionality of XTL? Or am I getting excited and being stupid at the > | > | same time? > | > > | > Yes, I think they do. (at least in this context) > | > | So we'll be able to throw out the Liason stuff??? (after 1.1.6 of course!) Not throw it out but move each function into an appropriate LFUN (again) and then remove the almost empty files. > I must admit that I have not looked into how Liason is used, so I'll > let Allan answer that. Yes. Allan. (ARRae)
- stream_cast<> Lars Gullik Bj�nnes
- Re: stream_cast<> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: stream_cast<> Lars Gullik Bj�nnes
- Re: stream_cast<> and Re: LyXFunc/... Angus Leeming
- Re: stream_cast<> and Re: LyXF... Lars Gullik Bj�nnes
- Re: stream_cast<> and Re: ... Angus Leeming
- Re: stream_cast<> and... Lars Gullik Bj�nnes
- Re: stream_cast<>... Allan Rae
- Re: stream_cast<> and Re: LyXF... Andre Poenitz
- Re: stream_cast<> and Re: ... Lars Gullik Bj�nnes
- Re: stream_cast<> and... Allan Rae
- Re: stream_cast<> and... Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: stream_cast<>... Lars Gullik Bj�nnes
- Re: stream_cast<... Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: stream_cast<... Andre Poenitz
- Re: stream_cast<... Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: stream_cast<... Lars Gullik Bj�nnes
- Re: stream_cast<... Allan Rae
