Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > As I stated in another bug, I really don't get the concept of working with > hidden buffers. > > The only thing I can imagine is if you have master and childs,
yes thats my usecase >but then the > hidden buffers will be closed automatically if the master is closed. but i dont see this. all hidden remain opened after closing master. > As long as I have no clue what this hidden buffer thing is needed for, I > can't decide on whether they should be closed on "close all". ok, but please note that this bug should be closed when we actually have fixed the problem which is - to rephrase - "using master with many childs cant be closed easily". cant rememeber i would need close all entry in a different situation. pavel
