On 03/07/2010 07:48 PM, Julien Rioux wrote:
On 05/03/2010 2:38 PM, rgheck wrote:
> On 03/05/2010 11:43 AM, Julien Rioux wrote:
> Missing requirements would obviously be better, since then the user
> knows what to do.
>
Thanks Richard.
Here's a patch for review. Missing packages that prevent a layout from
being available are listed in textclass.lst; they can be displayed to
the user when he/she attempts to use such a class.
Note that I am no C++ hacker, so please check that I am not doing
anything crazy here.
Committed. Thanks!
rh
