Richard Heck wrote:
>> Index: lib/lyx2lyx/lyx_2_0.py
>> ===================================================================
>> --- lib/lyx2lyx/lyx_2_0.py (revision 36398)
>> +++ lib/lyx2lyx/lyx_2_0.py (working copy)
>>
>>
>> + # FIXME: Would be nice if we could use the information of the
>> .layout file here
>> + classes = ["memoir", "scrartcl", "scrbook", "scrlttr2", "scrreprt"]
>>
> Yeah. I run into this a lot these days. But then I think: Do I really want
> to write a layout parser for lyx2lyx?
These were exactly my thoughts. Nevertheless, it would be nice to have one
:-)
> I take it that this means that these layouts should have a:
> Provides subscript 1
> tag, so that we don't issue \usepackage{subscript} for them?
They do have that. It simply means that it would be nicer not to hardcode
this knowledge in lyx2lyx.
Georg
