On 04/26/2011 10:17 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
On 26-4-2011 10:13, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 04/26/2011 10:11 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
On 26-4-2011 9:32, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 04/25/2011 07:07 PM, Johannes Wilm wrote:
I think this is a non-discussion. Neither one of us can control what
Lyx-developers choose to decide in 3-7 years, when LyX3.0 comes out.
Make it 10 ;-)
I like your optimism.
Oh but there is room for a release every six months in between 2.1,... 2.20
Is that optimist enough :-)
We should define goals for 3.0.
Shouldn't we start with 2.1 first?
I guess there will still be 2.0.x bug fix release an that Jürgen will
keep maintain them.
I'd like to propose that 2.x release are only about GUI improvements and
code cleanup. IOW 2.x should keep the file format unchanged.
3.0 would in this scheme introduce a new file format, maybe XML, maybe not.
I'd like also to propose that we switch to git now for 2.1 and than svn
is kept only for 2.0.x bug fixing... At this point we should have one
branch per new GUI feature or code cleanup; this branch will be merged
only if complete. This will help 2.x to remain stable despite the
incremental improvements.
Abdel.
